[왕초보탈출 1탄]11강 과제입니다...^^
Have to 를 이용한 문장
(평서문)
1. I have to work.
2.you have to read a book.
3. you have to clean the stone in the basket.
4.you have to take a picture.
5. we have to study another language.
6. I have to have a lunch.
7. She has to loss weight.
8. she has to smile for us.
9. she has to attend office on time.
10. She has to make puzzle.
(의문문)
1. Do i have to go home?
2. Do you have to study chinese?
3. do they have to leaving theirs's office on time?
4. Did you have to lateness?
5. Do i have to make money?
6. Do you have to exercise?
7. Do i have to see drama of 내 여친은 구미호?
8. Do you have to doze off ater lunch?
9. Why do you have to work?
10. Wnen do you have to study?
(부정문)
1. I don't have to waste time.
2. I didn't have to fight.
3. I don't have to clean the store.
4. you don't have to have a snack.
5. you don't have to talk.
6. They don't have to attend dine together.
7. We don't have to gabble.
8. I don't have to discontent.
9. We don't have to pressure.
10. She doesn't have to leaving her's office on time.
제가 작문한 게 맞나요???ㅎㅎ
1.옆 테이블에서 짜장면을 먹고 있던 커플은 이시원과 그의 아내였어를 저는
->The couple who were eating 짜장면 at the next table were Siwon and his wife 라고 작문했다고 했었는데.
커플을 단수 취급한다면 who 뒤에도 was가 되어야 하지 않나요? 답안지에는 were로 나와있는데..;
지금 보니 지난 번 답변을 잘못드린 것 같네요...ㅠㅠ 정말 죄송합니다...ㅠㅠ
일단 couple은 가장 최초에는 단수였으나, 그것이 점점 복수로도 쓰이면서(물론 잘못쓰인것이지만) 복수까지 가능하게 되었습니다. 결국 현재 couple은 단수도 되고 복수도 되며, 지금 예문과 같은 상황에서는 뒤에 '시원'과 '그의 아내'라고 표시해주니 복수가 맞습니다..ㅠㅠ 정말 죄송합니다..ㅠㅠ
2.감자칩과 프라이드치킨을 팔아왔던 KFC에서 징거라이스를 팔고있어를
->KFC where had been selling 감자칩 and 프라이드 is selling 징거라이스버거
이렇게 작문했는데
팔아왔던이라고 해서 had라고 했는데 해석에는 have라고 나와있네요. 제가 틀린건가요?
have? had 뭐가 맞죠.
둘 다 됩니다. have로 쓰면 (이전부터 쭈욱)팔아오고있다 라고 해주는 것이고
is selling으로 쓰면 (현재/지금)팔고있는 중이다 라고 해줄 수 있습니다.
꼭 모범답안에 맞춰서 맞고 틀리고를 찾기 보다는, 의미를 생각해주시는 것이 좋을 것 같고, 헷깔리는 경우 지금처럼 질문으로 남겨주시면 답해드리겠습니다^^
1.옆 테이블에서 짜장면을 먹고 있던 커플은 이시원과 그의 아내였어를 저는
->The couple who were eating 짜장면 at the next table were Siwon and his wife 라고 작문했다고 했었는데.
커플을 단수 취급한다면 who 뒤에도 was가 되어야 하지 않나요? 답안지에는 were로 나와있는데..;
2.감자칩과 프라이드치킨을 팔아왔던 KFC에서 징거라이스를 팔고있어를
->KFC where had been selling 감자칩 and 프라이드 is selling 징거라이스버거
이렇게 작문했는데
팔아왔던이라고 해서 had라고 했는데 해석에는 have라고 나와있네요. 제가 틀린건가요?
have? had 뭐가 맞죠.
Have to 를 이용한 문장
(평서문)
1. I have to work.
=> ok
2.you have to read a book.
=> ok
3. you have to clean the stone in the basket.
=> ok
4.you have to take a picture.
=> ok
5. we have to study another language.
=> ok
6. I have to have a lunch.
=> ok
7. She has to loss weight.
=> She has to lose weight.
8. she has to smile for us.
=> ok
9. she has to attend the office on time.
=> ok
*보통은 attend 보다
'go to the office 사무실 가다'
를 사용합니다.
10. She has to make a puzzle.
=> ok
(의문문)
1. Do i have to go home?
=> ok
2. Do you have to study chinese?
=> ok
3. do they have to leaving theirs's office on time?
=> Do they have to leave their office on time?
*have to 뒤에는 '동사원형'을 씁니다.
*their 자체로 '그들의' 라는 소유격의 의미이므로
-'s를 다시 붙이지 않아도 됩니다.
4. Did you have to lateness?
=> Did you have to be late?
5. Do i have to make money?
=> ok
6. Do you have to exercise?
=> ok
7. Do i have to see drama of 내 여친은 구미호?
=> Do i have to see the drama '내 여친은 구미호'?
8. Do you have to doze off ater lunch?
=> ok
9. Why do you have to work?
=> ok
10. Wnen do you have to study?
=> ok
(부정문)
1. I don't have to waste time.
=> ok
2. I didn't have to fight.
=> ok
3. I don't have to clean the store.
=> ok
4. you don't have to have a snack.
=> ok
5. you don't have to talk.
=> ok
6. They don't have to attend dine together.
=> They don't have to attend the dinner together.
*dine : (동사) 식사를 하다, 만찬을 들다
*dinner : (명사) 저녁식사, 정찬
7. We don't have to gabble.
=> ok
8. I don't have to discontent.
=> I don't have to be discontented.
*discontent : (명사) 불만
*discontented : (형용사) 불만족스러운
9. We don't have to pressure.
=> We don't have to press.
*pressure : (명사) 압박, 압력
*press : (동사) 누르다
10. She doesn't have to leaving her's office on time.
=> She doesn't have to leave her office on time.
*Good!
수고하셨습니다~